I Tried OpenClaude Design After Seeing One Instagram Clip. Then the Project Got Weirdly Real.
I did not start this as a serious product build. I saw a clip, got curious, and decided to test the tool. That is not what happened.
I saw an Instagram clip about OpenClaude Design, got curious, and decided to test it. Try the tool, see what it could do, maybe make a quick design, move on. That was the whole plan.
That is not what happened.
The actual progression looked more like this:
- Saw an Instagram clip
- Tried OpenClaude Design out of curiosity
- Started experimenting
- Combined it with Codex
- Iterated through trial and error
- Accidentally built something that felt real
- Now considering making it for real
It did not begin with a polished business plan or some perfect startup idea. It started with curiosity, a rough prompt, and a tool I wanted to test.
What is OpenClaude Design?
OpenClaude Design is an open-source tool that generates React UI prototypes from text prompts. You describe an interface, it builds the component. It runs locally on your machine, uses Claude as the AI backend, and outputs React files you can download as a ZIP and continue working on in any editor.
It is not a full-stack app builder. Think of it as a fast first draft for interfaces. The main value: getting past the blank screen in minutes rather than hours, without committing to a full platform or burning through credits on something speculative.
The project is on GitHub (imsai-sh/open-claude-design) and requires Git, Node.js, npm, and a Claude API key to run.
The first design
OpenClaude Design gave me the first version of the interface. It was not finished. But it was enough to see the shape of the thing.
At first, I was just trying to see whether the tool could create something beyond generic AI landing pages. The project slowly turned into a motorcycle rider network concept with smart route planning, shared telemetry, service tracking, rider dashboards, and community features.
The design started feeling less like a mockup and more like a system. That is when I moved into the next stage.
Moving from OpenClaude Design to Codex
After generating the first design, I downloaded the project as a ZIP file from OpenClaude Design and moved it into Codex. That became the real workflow.
OpenClaude Design was useful for getting the visual direction started. Codex was better for continuing the project.
I used Codex to:
- improve the UX layout
- clean up structure
- add images and video
- reorganize sections
- test different dashboard ideas
- expand the product flow
The workflow became:
OpenClaude Design → first visual direction
Codex → cleanup, UX changes, media, structure
Manual testing → catch what broke
That is where the process became more useful than the tool itself. OpenClaude Design did not magically build the final product. But it helped me get past the blank screen. Codex helped me turn the rough first version into something I could actually keep improving. And somewhere in that messy handoff, the idea started feeling real.
This is not a finished app
Right now this is still only a UX prototype. The pages exist. The interface structure exists. The product flow exists. But nothing actually works yet.
There is no backend. No real telemetry. No live syncing.
At this stage, I am focusing entirely on UX layout, feature structure, navigation, dashboard flow, and overall product feel. The goal right now is not to ship a SaaS. The goal is to figure out whether the product structure even makes sense before building the real system underneath it.
That distinction matters. A lot of AI-generated projects look finished from screenshots while nothing underneath actually exists. I did not want to pretend this was further along than it really is.
How to install OpenClaude Design
I wanted to try OpenClaude Design because I needed a better way to prototype website ideas without burning through limits every time I tested something. The installation itself was not the real problem. The confusing part came later.
Installing OpenClaude Design
The first step was getting the project running locally. I needed Git, Node.js, npm, and an API key.
Before installing anything, I checked whether they already existed:
git --version
node -v
npm -v
If those return version numbers, you are probably fine. If Node.js is missing, install a recent version before continuing. A lot of React/Vite projects behave strangely when Node is outdated.
Downloading the project
I opened PowerShell and moved to the folder where I wanted the project to live:
cd C:\Users\YourName
git clone https://github.com/imsai-sh/open-claude-design
cd open-claude-design
One of my early mistakes was running npm from the wrong folder. If npm cannot find package.json, it usually means you are standing in the wrong directory. The error looks like:
npm error enoent Could not read package.json
That does not mean npm is broken. It usually means you are not inside the actual project folder. The fix: run cd open-claude-design then dir. If you see package.json, you are in the right place.
Running the app
npm run setup
npm run dev
The app should then launch locally in the browser. The important part: the dev server is running and the browser can load the app.
The confusing part: the blank preview
This is where things became misleading. The app looked like it was working. The API key worked, the files were generated, the server was running. But the preview was blank.
That is the kind of issue that makes you think the whole setup failed. It had not failed.
The real issue
When I opened the browser console, the error showed CSS being interpreted as JavaScript:
Unexpected token ':'
The generated code looked like valid CSS:
:root {
--primary-color: #1A1A1A;
--accent-color: #00FF99;
}
Valid CSS. Wrong preview environment. So React never rendered the page. The server worked, the API worked, the generated files existed – the preview simply could not parse the generated structure.
The fix that finally worked
The solution was to stop OpenClaude Design from generating separate CSS files. I started using strict technical constraints in the prompt:
Create only one App.jsx file
Use inline React style objects only
Do not create styles.css
Do not import CSS
Do not use external libraries
Export one default React component
That immediately improved the preview reliability. The important lesson: the generated project may technically make sense in React, but the preview environment may not support the structure correctly. So instead of asking for "a complete project", I started asking for "one clean preview file first."
The workflow I use now
The biggest lesson: vague prompts create vague interfaces. The first prompt works much better when it reads like a proper creative brief.
The structure I now use:
Artifact + purpose + audience + layout + visual style + technical constraints
For example:
Create a React landing page for a motorcycle route planning app.
Audience: motorcycle clubs and long-distance riders.
Goal: make the product feel premium, practical, and useful for planning group rides.
Layout:
- hero section with route-planning CTA
- route preview panel
- club ride features
- maintenance and ride history
- final CTA
Visual style:
dark dashboard feel, metallic panels, subtle map lines, orange and cyan accents.
Technical constraints:
Create only App.jsx.
Use inline React styles only.
Do not create styles.css.
Do not use external libraries.
Export one default React component.
That last technical section matters more than most people realize. Without it, the generated preview can easily break.
What I learned
OpenClaude Design is useful for getting past the blank screen. Codex is better for continuing the project once the direction exists. The mistake is expecting one tool to do everything.
The better workflow:
- OpenClaude Design → initial visual direction
- Codex → cleanup, UX changes, media, structure
- Manual testing → catch what broke
That combination turned a random experiment into something I am now seriously considering building properly.
Used in this build
- OpenClaude Design - initial visual direction, first React prototype
- Codex - UX refinement, layout cleanup, media, structure
See more builds that used similar tools: all real builds · Tab Shelf Cleaner case study